SEO Title: How Much Money Could Texas Save in a Regional College Football Conference?
Meta Description: A financial case study estimating how much the University of Texas could save by moving from the SEC to a smaller regional conference, including travel savings, attendance impact, rivalry revenue, and media-rights risks.
Suggested URL Slug: texas-regional-conference-savings
How Much Money Could the University of Texas Save in a Regional Conference?
Executive Summary
The financial argument for regional conferences is simple: college football realignment has been driven mostly by football media revenue, but the travel costs are paid across the entire athletic department.
For the University of Texas, SEC membership creates a much wider travel footprint than a more regional conference would. That may be manageable for football, where TV revenue is enormous and travel happens only a handful of times per season. But it is much harder to justify for Olympic sports, women’s sports, baseball, softball, volleyball, soccer, tennis, swimming, golf, track, and other non-football programs.
Using Texas as the example, this model estimates that a regional conference could reduce Texas’ annual conference travel costs by roughly $1.0 million to $1.8 million per year, with a base-case estimate of about $1.39 million per year.
In addition, stronger regional rivalries could produce added ticket, concessions, parking, merchandise, and donor value. For Texas, that added annual revenue could reasonably fall in the range of $1 million to $4 million per year, depending on ticket demand, opponent quality, and how many games are already sold out.
The key issue is media revenue. If Texas lost tens of millions of dollars in media-rights revenue, travel savings alone would not offset that loss. But if a regional model preserved national TV value through playoffs, rivalry games, and major brands, the financial case becomes much stronger.
Texas’ current football future inside the SEC includes a nine-game conference schedule beginning in 2026, with Arkansas, Oklahoma, and Texas A&M as annual opponents. The SEC says the format gives each school three annual opponents and rotation through the rest of the league.
Proposed Texas Regional Conference
The proposed regional conference would include 12 schools with strong geographic, historic, and fan-interest logic:
| School | Location Logic |
|---|---|
| Texas | Anchor school |
| Texas A&M | Historic in-state rival |
| Oklahoma | Historic Red River rival |
| Oklahoma State | Regional Big 12/Southwest fit |
| Arkansas | Historic Southwest Conference rival |
| Baylor | In-state rival |
| Texas Tech | In-state rival |
| TCU | In-state rival |
| SMU | Dallas market/in-state rival |
| Houston | In-state rival/major city |
| LSU | Border-state regional brand |
| Missouri | Former Big 12/SEC regional fit |
Using Austin as the base point, the current SEC footprint averages roughly 654 miles one way to Texas’ conference peers. The proposed regional conference averages roughly 298 miles one way. That is a reduction of about 356 miles per one-way trip, or roughly 54% shorter travel distance.
Estimated One-Way Distances From Austin
| Opponent | Estimated Miles From Austin |
|---|---|
| Texas A&M | 86 |
| Baylor | 95 |
| Houston | 148 |
| TCU | 169 |
| SMU | 185 |
| Texas Tech | 333 |
| Oklahoma | 340 |
| LSU | 391 |
| Oklahoma State | 405 |
| Arkansas | 449 |
| Missouri | 672 |
The biggest advantage is not just fewer miles. It is the ability to convert some trips from flights to buses, reduce hotel nights, reduce missed class time, and make road games easier for fans.
Important Assumptions
These are estimates. Actual numbers would require Texas’ internal travel contracts, charter agreements, hotel contracts, per diem policies, equipment shipping costs, and sport-specific scheduling.
| Cost Item | Base Assumption |
|---|---|
| Football charter trip | $150,000 to $225,000 per away trip |
| Non-football commercial flight | $500 to $850 per person round trip |
| Bus travel | $6 to $9 per mile, round-trip basis |
| Hotel cost | $125 per person per night blended estimate |
| Meals/per diem | $70 per person per travel day |
| Football travel party | 150 to 180 people |
| Basketball travel party | 25 to 35 people |
| Baseball travel party | 38 to 45 people |
| Softball travel party | 30 to 38 people |
| Volleyball/soccer travel party | 28 to 36 people |
| Track/swim travel party | 45 to 60 people |
| Golf/tennis travel party | 10 to 16 people |
For stadium capacity and attendance context, Texas’ football stadium capacity is listed by the school at 100,119. Moody Center is listed by Texas Athletics as an approximately 15,000-seat venue. Texas women’s basketball reported average attendance of 7,836 for 2024-25. One 2025 football attendance tracker listed Texas football average attendance at about 102,367, meaning football is already effectively full. Therefore, added football revenue would mostly come from premium pricing, visiting-fan demand, donations, and resale-level demand rather than thousands of empty seats.
Estimated Travel Savings by Sport for Texas
The base-case estimate below shows how reduced conference travel distance could affect individual sports across the Texas athletic department.
| Sport | Away Conference Trips | Travel Party | Current Annual Cost | Regional Annual Cost | Estimated Savings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Football | 4.5 | 165 | $1,051,763 | $657,608 | $394,155 |
| Men’s basketball | 9 | 30 | $355,050 | $225,630 | $129,420 |
| Women’s basketball | 9 | 30 | $355,050 | $225,630 | $129,420 |
| Baseball | 5 | 42 | $482,550 | $347,550 | $135,000 |
| Softball | 4 | 35 | $315,700 | $231,700 | $84,000 |
| Volleyball | 7 | 28 | $247,940 | $154,924 | $93,016 |
| Soccer | 5 | 34 | $313,200 | $223,200 | $90,000 |
| Men’s tennis | 4 | 14 | $72,840 | $48,264 | $24,576 |
| Women’s tennis | 4 | 14 | $72,840 | $48,264 | $24,576 |
| Men’s golf | 3 | 10 | $58,800 | $42,300 | $16,500 |
| Women’s golf | 3 | 10 | $58,800 | $42,300 | $16,500 |
| Track & field | 3 | 55 | $297,900 | $228,900 | $69,000 |
| Swimming & diving | 3 | 45 | $248,100 | $191,100 | $57,000 |
| Rowing / other Olympic | 3 | 55 | $297,900 | $231,900 | $66,000 |
| Other Olympic sports | 6 | 25 | $189,750 | $128,850 | $60,900 |
| Total | $4,418,183 | $3,028,120 | $1,390,063 |
Interpretation of the Travel Savings
The base model suggests Texas could save about $1.39 million per year on conference travel alone.
The biggest savings come from several areas:
- Football, because the travel party is large and charter travel is expensive.
- Baseball and softball, because series travel often requires multiple hotel nights.
- Basketball, because both the men’s and women’s teams play many conference road games.
- Volleyball, soccer, track, swimming, and Olympic sports, because they currently absorb the burden of conference geography without generating football-level revenue.
Low, Base, and High Savings Scenarios
| Scenario | Estimated Annual Travel Savings |
|---|---|
| Conservative | $1.0 million |
| Base case | $1.39 million |
| Aggressive | $1.8 million |
The conservative case assumes Texas already negotiates very efficient travel, keeps hotel costs controlled, and still needs flights for many regional opponents.
The aggressive case assumes more trips convert to bus travel, fewer hotel nights are required, and travel parties are larger than the base estimate.
Attendance and Revenue Impact
Regional conferences may increase attendance and revenue, but Texas is a special case because football already sells extremely well. That means football upside is less about filling empty seats and more about premium demand and higher-value rivalry games.
Potential revenue benefits include:
- Higher average ticket price
- More premium demand
- More donor interest
- More visiting fans
- More concessions and merchandise
- More media attention around rivalry games
Estimated Added Revenue From Regional Rivalries
| Sport | Current Attendance Assumption | Home Conference Games | Added Tickets / Game | Avg Ticket | Added Ticket Revenue | Added Other Revenue | Total Added Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Football | 100,000+ | 4.5 | 0 to 2,000 equivalent premium demand | $125 | $0 to $1,125,000 | $250,000 to $1,000,000 | $250,000 to $2,125,000 |
| Men’s basketball | 10,000 to 11,000 | 9 | 500 to 2,000 | $45 | $202,500 to $810,000 | $100,000 to $350,000 | $302,500 to $1,160,000 |
| Women’s basketball | 7,800 | 9 | 500 to 2,500 | $25 | $112,500 to $562,500 | $50,000 to $200,000 | $162,500 to $762,500 |
| Baseball | 6,000 to 7,000 | 15 conference dates | 500 to 1,500 | $20 | $150,000 to $450,000 | $75,000 to $250,000 | $225,000 to $700,000 |
Base-Case Added Revenue Estimate
| Category | Base Estimate |
|---|---|
| Football rivalry premium | $1,000,000 |
| Men’s basketball added revenue | $600,000 |
| Women’s basketball added revenue | $350,000 |
| Baseball added revenue | $400,000 |
| Softball/volleyball/soccer added interest | $150,000 |
| Sponsorship/donor/local media lift | $500,000 |
| Total Base Added Revenue | $3,000,000 |
This means the total annual financial impact for Texas could be:
| Component | Base Estimate |
|---|---|
| Travel savings | $1.39 million |
| Added rivalry/attendance revenue | $3.0 million |
| Total positive annual impact before media rights impact | $4.39 million |
Why Regional Rivalries Matter
A Texas regional conference would create a much more natural fan map.
Games against Texas A&M, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Texas Tech, Baylor, TCU, Houston, SMU, LSU, Oklahoma State, and Missouri are easier for fans to understand, travel to, and care about.
A regional conference would likely create more games that feel important locally, even if not all of them are national top-10 matchups.
| Matchup | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Texas vs. Texas A&M | Historic in-state rivalry; huge fan and donor interest |
| Texas vs. Oklahoma | One of the strongest national rivalries |
| Texas vs. Arkansas | Old Southwest Conference rivalry |
| Texas vs. Texas Tech | In-state alumni and student interest |
| Texas vs. Baylor | Central Texas rivalry |
| Texas vs. TCU | Dallas/Fort Worth recruiting and alumni interest |
| Texas vs. Houston | Major Texas metro matchup |
| Texas vs. SMU | Dallas market and private-school contrast |
| Texas vs. LSU | Strong regional brand; drivable for some fans |
| Texas vs. Oklahoma State | Regional Big 12 history |
| Texas vs. Missouri | Former Big 12/SEC crossover |
Fan Travel Impact
The proposed model is much better for fans.
Under the current SEC structure, many Texas road games involve trips to Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and other long-distance destinations.
Under the proposed model, fans could reasonably drive to:
- College Station
- Waco
- Fort Worth
- Dallas
- Houston
- Norman
- Stillwater
- Fayetteville
- Baton Rouge
- Lubbock
That matters because drivable road games increase:
- Visiting fan attendance
- Alumni engagement
- Student road trips
- Local media buzz
- Hotel and restaurant spending in host cities
- Game atmosphere
This is especially important for basketball, baseball, softball, volleyball, and soccer, where visiting fan attendance can be meaningful but usually cannot justify expensive long-distance travel.
The Media Revenue Issue
This is the largest counterargument.
The SEC’s current value is driven by national brands, national TV windows, playoff relevance, and high-profile football matchups. A regional conference model would need to preserve that value.
A regional model works financially only if one of the following is true:
- Media revenue does not decline materially.
- Media revenue declines slightly, but travel savings and rivalry revenue offset it.
- A national playoff or inter-regional scheduling system preserves national TV inventory.
- Regional conferences create enough rivalry inventory to remain highly valuable to networks.
Travel savings alone do not justify giving up major media money.
For example, if Texas saved $1.4 million in travel and gained $3 million in attendance/rivalry value, the positive impact is about $4.4 million. But if media revenue dropped by $10 million or $20 million, the model would fail financially.
So the best version of this model is not “make every schedule local.” It is:
- Regional regular-season conferences
- Preserved major rivalry games
- National playoff
- Select inter-regional nonconference games
- Better travel structure for Olympic sports
- Media packages built around regional rivalries and postseason stakes
Competitive Balance and Athlete Welfare
The financial case is only part of the argument.
Regional conferences could also improve:
- Student-athlete recovery
- Missed class time
- Sleep schedules
- Family attendance
- Olympic sport budgets
- Rivalry intensity
- Fan identity
- Recruiting clarity
- Campus atmosphere
This especially matters in sports that travel frequently but do not generate football-level revenue.
A volleyball, soccer, tennis, golf, or swimming athlete may experience the worst part of national realignment without receiving the financial benefit that football receives.
Risks and Counterarguments
A serious model has to include the downsides.
| Risk | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Media revenue loss | Biggest financial risk |
| Existing contracts | Conferences have long-term media deals |
| Grant-of-rights issues | Some leagues make leaving difficult |
| Exit fees | Realignment can be expensive |
| Network resistance | TV partners may prefer national super-leagues |
| Uneven league strength | Some regional conferences would be stronger than others |
| Loss of national matchups | Fewer Texas-Georgia or Texas-Alabama-type games |
| Political resistance | Schools and states may fight over inclusion |
| Football dominance | Football money may override Olympic-sport savings |
Final Conclusion
The financial case for a Texas regional conference is not based on travel savings alone. Travel savings matter, but they are not large enough by themselves to overcome a major media-rights loss.
The base-case travel savings estimate is about $1.39 million per year. The broader annual positive impact, including added rivalry and attendance revenue, could reach approximately $4.39 million before media-rights impact.
That is meaningful money, especially when spread across Olympic sports and non-football programs. But the model only works if regional conferences are designed in a way that protects national television value.
For Texas, the strongest argument is not simply that a regional conference would be cheaper. The stronger argument is that a regional conference could be cheaper, more logical, better for fans, better for student-athletes, and still nationally valuable if paired with a playoff-driven media structure.
In short, Texas does not need a smaller regional conference because it cannot afford the SEC. Texas can afford the SEC. The question is whether the current nationalized conference structure is the best use of money, time, fan energy, and athlete welfare across the entire athletic department.
A regional conference model built around Texas, Texas A&M, Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, Arkansas, Baylor, Texas Tech, TCU, SMU, Houston, LSU, and Missouri would create a shorter travel footprint, stronger regional rivalries, more drivable games, and potentially millions of dollars in annual financial value.
The biggest challenge is not proving that regional conferences save money. The biggest challenge is proving that they can save money while preserving the media revenue that currently drives college football realignment.